I'm also skeptical on the "very easy to avoid" part for missiles near terminal of range when glide Illustrations of where ranges and NEZ are different would illustrate this far better. Nevermind how many missile kills in modern era are where pilots never saw it coming, how could you possibly have enough information over the many possible scenarios and variables involved to declare that easy? I'm also skeptical on the "very easy to avoid" part for missiles near terminal of range when glide, something like AMRAAM is probably coming down from a ballistic trajectory still at a very high speed. This holds especially true given the "game changing" focus of your video, some real numbers or (even better) illustrations of where ranges and NEZ are different would illustrate this far better. For example, what is the estimated NEZ of AMRAAM-D that has a huge increase in range compared to previous generations? Obviously nobody is publishing the exact number, but if you're willing to throw out guesses on Meteor's NEZ it would be good to contrast it with the competing missile to illustrate what an advantage it has, instead of just exclaiming how huge Meteor's NEZ is without context. I think the video would be better with comparisons to other weapons. Looking for a place that's strictly procurement related? Check out /r/MilitaryProcurement Looking for a place with even less credibility? /r/NonCredibleDefense might be for you. Do not try to debate the mod on your interpretation of the #Rules promoting terrorism, racist comments, etc). Just because a #Rule is not listed does not mean we cannot enforce it (i.e. The /r/lesscredibledefence moderators reserve the right to moderate the subreddit how we see fit for the good of the community. Failure to follow the rules could result in a ban. This includes asking for help with homework or research projects. We can make exceptions for non-profit organizations but please send us a message before posting. Simply put, keep it civil.ĭo not violate OPSEC, COMSEC, INFOSEC, PERSECĭo not post any content which violates OPSEC, COMSEC, INFOSEC, PERSEC (or PII), and do not post or ask about anything classified. No attacking the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than addressing the substance of the argument itself. Pay attention to the rules or your time here will be shortlived. This community exists for sharing & discussing anecdotes, tidbits, historical events, current news/events, weapon sales/developments, and more Welcome to LessCredibleDefence - the home of links which have failed to pass the quality requirement of r/CredibleDefense.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |